Kautilya to plato but this was systematic and persistant developement
characteristic: social & production org
problem of incentives
Evolution
Adam Smith →
Social science embraces Pluralism
Undergrad textbook (Marshall-Walrus tradition): Neo-classical is truth → Market is the best way for resource alloc → not consistent with other compelling paradigms
Criticisms, internal/external
internal: accepts premise of self-seeking individuals, criticizes fundamental theorems of welfare economics (information economics)
external: inductive tradition sucks! Why analyze atomistic individual to understand society (Marx and Veblen)
Evolution of economic thought
Pre-classical → Physiocrats, mercantilists.
Classical policitical econ → Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Malthus, Karl Marx
Information Economics critique of welfare theorem → Stiglitz
Controversy between classical & Keynesian macroecon
Recent developments: New Classical, New Keynesian, Real Business Cycle models