Lecture 4 The Neoclassical Tradition An Introduction
Fundas of NM
Principles of Economics by Marshall: represents academically rigorous and acceptable economics - then and now
Distill the major assumptions and principles
Illustrated with captivating graphs
Visualization of complex mathematical relationships
Work is centered around: rationality, preferences and utility maximization
Efficiency has been the heart of the processes
Conceptual core assumes: - normative criterion
consistent preferences
maximization of personal satisfaction of preferences
Marshall created sound mathematical foundation, but was sensitive to its limitations. He mailed A.L. Bowley (1906)
Use Mathematics as a shorthand language, rather than an engine of enquiry
Keep to them till you have done
Translate into english
Then illustrate by examples, important in real life
Burn the mathematics
If you can't succeed in (4), burn (3)
Unrealistic assumptions, make the mathematician lose the track of the reality in the "maze of pretentious and unhelpful symbols"
Mervyn King (2016) critique of financial crisis 2007 - 2008, highlighted the limitations of too narrowly defined mathematical economics
Financial crash revealed that sometimes crucial factors are left out of economic models to make the math tractable.
Predictive models' failures surprised even the fans
Economic Entities
The Individual (consumer) - Utility
The Firm - Profits
Allocate each of their scarce resources in the most efficient manner to max their payoff
Interesting: same analytical machinery for both??
The Firm
Marshalls' NM work centered on characterizing 'the firm' = focus of microeconomics
Firms are assumed to sell homogenous (perfect substitutes)
Modern work: brand marketing = differentiating firms
Firms are assumed to be price takers
Assumed that there is free entry and exit in the market, at least in the long run
Far from reality bro
Assumed to have perfect information (no seller can sell at a higher price than their competitors)
Price elasticity of demand
Marshall's supply and demand curve...
Supply & Demand curves
Mkt equilibrium
Relationship between qty supplied/demanded and price
law of diminishing returns
Are these assumptions perfect representations? No! Milton Friedman voiced it out.
Firms seem like the ECON
The Consumer
Assumed to have complete, transitive preferences (can rank options)
These assumptions are often relaxed to work with reality. But for NM to work, people must conform to these characterizations.
Theory of revealed preferences
Descriptively flawed and predictably hopeless
Rigorous mathematical models deviated too much (less than perfect is better than nothing)
Marshall & Marginalism
Efficiency is always obtained at the margins of activity
e.g. increase production till \(MC=MR\)
cease production at the point of marginal unit loss
Stop consuming when the costs outweigh the benefits
People continue to be the the relationship even if they had been experiencing disutility for a long time... we forgive even though its inefficient... "we invested time"
Law of diminishing marginal utility (too many ice creams can cause disutility)
> Happiness is in the increase... not in the state
Excessive game playing, twitter use (pathological behavior) are actual problems
Axioms of Consumer Behavior
Completeness: Can rank all possible choice bundles
Transitivity: \(A \succ B\) and \(B \succ C\) then \(A \succ C\)
More-Is-Better: More of a good is preferred to less (Ceteris Paribus)
Continuity: Small changes in quantity shouldn't cause abrupt preference shifts
Convexity: Consumers prefer diversified bundles to extremes (e.g. mix of apples and oranges over only oranges or only apples)
Neoclassical Rationality
All five axioms \(\implies\) consistent behavior
Consistent behavior based on consistent preferences is a key aspect in defining rational behavior
Key Principles
Marginal Analysis: Decisions are made incrementally: \(MC = MR\)
Sunk Cost Fallacy: Rational agents ignore irrecoverable costs (But humans honor sunk costs (non-refundable concert tickets) due to loss aversion)
Opportunity Cost: CBA must consider opportunity costs (explicit and implicit cost)
Incentive Response: ECONs do respond. Law of behavioral psychology, simple animals allocate behavior in a way that maximize their total reward
The point of it all: Utility Maximization
Expected Utility Theory (EUT)
Von Neumann-Morgenstern Theorem:
Should behave in a manner to maximize expected value or utility
\(E[X] = 1.25\) and sure short \(X = 1\) then the first should be chosen.
Empirical violations
Risk Aversion (prefer certain outcomes)
Prospect Theory: (people evaluate losses differently from gains)